Exactly, what we're trying to achieve here now, at infinity.family

Appears like a lot of content needs to be cleaned up, or [marked-for-deletion].

Apparently, that single-page application didn't work out very well. Issues are numerous. For one thing -- someone who just wants to share a single page with someone, makes them download a whole app, just to show a single page.

So, now, finally 2020, I have decided to try to rework it in plain Django, right here, on 0oo.li, without any additional JavaScript. ^__^ Let's see how it goes~

Btw., so, I'm still considering, where to put the backlog. Maybe it should be on whatever we use, like, e.g., I use Dynalist. Or, if we use GitHub's issues, it would be nice to put day-summaries here as task results.

Most of deaths are because of lack of oxygen, so, an indicator in the case of very large spectrum of issues.

This actually is worth trying. Very little effort is required, to pull data from WikiData, and a bit of compute/memory, to have a usable thing.

{1.5}

hello {1.5}. {?3.5}

“Wearable graphene sensors use ambient light to monitor health” use ambient light———— Exactly same idea, mabe you can cooprerate with them

[Transiency@0D38482D], [+] :)

测量血氧水平，Nature上有具体化这个想法的实验 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03483-7

Umm, there is a package now, that can be tested with:

Try pip install metaform, and then

import metaform

metaform.load({
'*': 'https://github.com/mindey/terms/wiki/person#foaf',
 'url': 'http://dbpedia.org/resource/John_Lennon',
 'fullname': 'John Lennon',
 'birthdate': '1940-10-09',
 'spouse': 'http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cynthia_Lennon'
}).format()

Maybe there should be also research tax, cause researchers (esp. in public universities) create good for the public.

Related protocols: - DIDs - DCATs

What's great about this idea, is that the default meanings are already known to people, so, one can expect people to be able to use it immediately to communicate.

Actually, the above does not describe how we would organize that index of entities; how much storage it would require to index them, and to reason with respect to those indices.

https://dynalist.io/d/5Toawz5uEuhZ3fNUns3ouSpA.

Doing some work {1.5}. Also declare:

ちょっと言語の区別を確認したいです。

hello world

Test

So, semantic web technologies -- overconstrained system?

@Mindey@FE706DAF Thanks for the question. In answer, I would say that yes, I'd be up for running this project; however, no, I do not have collaborators already. I'm happy for you to do what you think is best with it re draft v public. Also happy to work with anyone interested in putting it together to make it a reality. I think it would be a very useful tool for people.

Hey, Niamhnab, do you think you would like to run this project? Namely, is this something that, given that you had some collaborators, you would want to do? If not, let me know, and I think it would make sense to make it as a draft instead of public.

[Divisor@EC9C06F0], I wonder, had you proceeded with this undertaking? :)

[Transiency@0D38482D], Nice. yes, you can actually even comment your work. ;)

....

In other words: https://wiki.mindey.com/shared/shots/1017b5309975b3acc49290e02-on-importing-web-content.mp4.

Further thoughts: https://wiki.mindey.com/shared/shots/609ea329e0f97fa49e87c96e6-text-classifier-further-thoughts.mp4.

Nothing new these days? Not bored, when Halfbakery is down...?

What would such social conditionality mean? Technology is double-edge sword, does that mean, that the patent owners would be able to restrict the use of technology for certain ranges of purposes?

How would this relate to technology use by governments? Patents usually are not enforceable at government levels.

What would be the optimal structure of the private-public ownership for such condominium law, for addressing the global catastrophic risks?

While makes total sense, this assumes that the losses are net positive, and that we don't know who is going to be affected by the global catastrophic risks.

If they are net negative (e.g., practically everyone loses), or it is known in advance, that e.g., the locations near the sea are going to suffer most due to the rising sea level and global warming, I think, this would make this kind of insurance scheme harder to implement.

Very concrete. Would be interested in deeper analysis, how this new structure would affect overall ability to address the global risks.

Sounds a lot like series of funding, except, unlike in business, where we have private investors, this would be the one that's extension of UN? How is this new, sounds a bit more like perpetuation of the UN.

Why 8? While 8 is more than 1, the number "8" looks arbitrary. What criteria would be chosen to determine the "commitment to ecological and social well-being," of the organizations? How would this be inclusive of emergent organizations, rather than just de-facto most powerful world's organizations?

Who would invite the cities to start pledging part of their budget for that, and how would the invitations have to be framed to make them work?

Is it the idea to basically gamify global challenges by having states and cities join a social contract? How would we motivate that?

Looks a lot like what would be if we turned Infinity into a DAPP, except, no mention of the further structure. E.g., whats the most effective way to turn ideas into projects, or link ideas with problems, or execute the projects, etc. How such free market would manage projects.

If it is a different currency per project, then it looks a lot like what we have on Ethereum via ERC20ies, and already exists.

Yeah, but this doesn't explain how this kind of system could be constructed from organizational and technical side. Can you elaborate on that?

How would such facilitation training work? And, how would one keep the facilitation politically neutral?

[Tomas@9911CE3F], quick search turns up these numbers:

Calculating the exact number of wild animals on earth is difficult, but estimates suggest that it is several orders of magnitude higher than humans and farmed animals combined. For every human on earth, there are at least 10 animals suffering in farms, and likely 1,000 to 100,000 wild vertebrates and plausibly 100,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 “bugs” (including creatures such as insects, spiders and earthworms). This means that even if these animals are on average experiencing more than 1/100,000,000th to 1/10,000,000th the suffering experienced by the average animal in a farm, the absolute amount of wild-animal suffering is greater.

Reference: Wild Animal Suffering Research

Mindey@FE706DAF Could you describe, how many animals are affected of this problem?